BBC tells tale of teenage mum and why abortions and sex are bad, and Catholicism is good

Kizzy Mum at 14As I've only been living in the UK for two years, I suppose my views on certain TV channels and organizations may be a bit different. For example, up until yesterday, I always thought that when I turned on the BBC to watch a documentary, that I would be watching something that unbiased, if not liberal. (Stop laughing at me.) However, after watching Born Suvivors: Kizzy, Mum at 14 I found myself astonished at how blatantly anti-abortion, pro-Catholicism, anti-sex education, and anti-sex the program was.

This episode of Born Survivors initially comes across as a documentary about a teenage mother who is trying to "get her baby's teenage father to acknowledge his child". They start the program focusing on the absent father, and then slowly start showing home footage Kizzy's family starting filming as a way of showing other teenagers what will "happen" to you if you have "underage sex". It was the emphasis on "underage" that started to really bother me. Shouldn't they be saying "unprotected"?

Sadly, the emphasis on "underage" sex being the cause for so many teenage pregnancies in Kizzy's impoverished town wasn't the most disturbing part of the documentary. Slowly but surely, we start finding out things about Kizzy's family that makes it suddenly very clear that this is not a documentary about teenage mums, but about anti-abortionists, religion and how sex education promotes "underage" sex.

Firstly, we find out that Kizzy's family did not want her to have an abortion, despite being 13 at the time of conception, because Kizzy's older sister was a victim of "cot death" and died at only 3 months old. The BBC commentator then goes on to defend Kizzy's family's feelings on abortion by adding: "Life is too precious." You're right, BBC! Life is precious! How could anyone ever get a horrid abortion when babies people actually want are dying?!

However, what bothered me most was that the next scene after an emotional ceremony at the grave of Kizzy's passed older sister, Kizzy's father took her and her infant son to what the BBC commentator described as being a "special rally"; otherwise known as an anti-abortion rally. Yup! AN ANTI-ABORTION RALLY. We are then treated to an extra special explanation from Kizzy's father about how an abortion would have affected him, and how it would have made him feel, and that's why Kizzy wasn't given that option.

Even worse, as Kizzy is clearly influenced by her religious father, they have a great voice over of Kizzy condemning her school's sex education program. She says that "the school kind of promotes it", the "it" being sex. She also says that, "The message that I get from it is that 'you can come to us if you get pregnant and we'll sort an abortion out'." George W Bush would love this girl.

Cut to the next scene with her father, Kevin Neal, complaining that Tic Tac (her school's sex ed program) "undermines" what parents tell their children. He explains that he believes in abstinence, and that children should wait until 16 to have sex because "our religions doesn't allow it" and goes on to expresses his disgust with teachers and school workers giving away condoms to their students by calling it "unethical".

Yes, Mr.Neal. It's the school's fault that your 13-year-old daughter went and had unprotected sex and got knocked up. Not yours or your wife's fault. Just the schools. Never mind the fact that even if the school did hand your daughter a condom and told her to go have sex, she obviously didn't take their advice and clearly chose to not use the damn condom.

I won't bore you with all the other disgusting comments made about sex education, or the fact that Kizzy chose to have her son baptized. Or that she then chose to join the Catholic church because they were the only ones who supported her during her pregnancy. (And probably the old ladies who organized the "special" anti-abortion rally.)

However, I would like to fully express my disappointment and frustration at the BBC for making such a horribly biased "documentary". The title of the series is "Born Survivors", though I have to wonder what the point of the story was. To use pathetic scare tactics like describing how many times Kizzy's vaginal tissue had to be cut (3) and how many stitches she had to have (80) to get kids under 16 to not have sex? To further send the message that sex education doesn't work, and only promotes "underage", unprotected and misinformed sex? Or was it to "prove" that abortion is not only shameful, but murder, and that religion, the ways of the Catholic Church and choosing to not have abortions are the only just options for women?

I won't be watching Born Survivors or BBC Three again any time soon.

Cate Sevilla is a freelance writer in London and regular contributor to Dollymix.

BBC tells tale of teenage mum and why abortions and sex are bad, and Catholicism is good - Comments

  • Tierna

    Ironically Cate Sevila's review of Born Survivors in which she accuses it of being "horribly biased" illustrates considerable bias in her own views, which she apparently feels will not frustrate anyone.

    I watched this programme too and felt that Kizzy's family did respond to the dilemma of her pregnancy in acordance with their own convictions or beliefs about what was the right thing to do. And while having the baby is not necessarily what most parents would encourage their preganant 13 yr old to do, having come through the turmoil, Kizzy came across as confident, motivated and very happy young woman with clear goals and the support to achieve them.

    The parents expressed concerns in the programme - which many parents share - that the approach to sex education and underage sex adopted by Kizzy's school was not effective in dealing with the problem and they expressed their opinion that handing out contraceptives to very young teenagers was undermining parental attempts to encourage their children not to become sexually active so young. The commentator then highlighted the School's alternative viewpoint. This subject was not dwelled on for a significant part of the programme and was not returned to.

    It is extremely patronising and ignorant of Ms Sevilla to assume that Kizzy's views regarding sex education were "clearly influenced by her religious father" and could not have been her own based on her very relevant experience. There was no evidence to support that contention.

    I have no idea what other "disgusting comments about sex education" Ms Sevilla is referring to as she doesn't explain this either but just expects that we take it on her word.

    Rather than switching to other channels (which presumably Ms Sevilla feels will show more "unbiased" programmes) I feel her time would be better spent taking a look at her own rigid views and narrow minded attitudes(including what is acceptable in a BBC 'documentary'!). She might then begin to understand that public service broadcasting should include a variety of perspectives on important issues and might even improve her own prospects as a writer into the bargain!(in my humble opinion!).

  • diane

    Aug 7th 2008. I have just watched the programme (my first viewing). I am a mother of 3 "children" (21,19,17!) (not a grandmother yet - ah well) Also a midwife who has looked after many young mothers and hopefully supported them in their initial stages of such a life-changing experience. Never judgemental - as we all know it can happen to ANYONE, not just 14 year olds. I have lost 3 babies myself, in my 40's. Life experience and, I guess, my job, in which I have had to deal with unwanted loss of babies, have contributed to...not "anti abortion", but "pro life". Fair enough - abortion is an option to those who need it, but this wonderful family have shown us that having a baby at ANY age can be a joyous thing, and extremely positive. I won't comment further (apart from to say-not all folks are as fortunate as Kizzy-her family and boyfriend Michael are absolutely second to none-I hope he's still around - he is exceptional!) In a way it may Not have intended, this documentary was an inspiration to those young people who have already become pregnant, and are feeling like it's the end of their world..as we can see, it's just the beginning, and they have everything to look forward to. Brilliant.

  • kev neal

    If you didn't watch it, how can you comment? We can assure you that this particular film maker was beyond being bias, her name was Trish Williamson, the original TV am weather girl and unfortunatly she died during the making on this programme, and unlike this web-site she had OUR families full permission to use our photos and experiences, you should be ashamed of yourselves!!!! Kev Neal

  • R.E

    I think you will find that VERY few if not NO documentary's are not biased. Even ones that seem not biased are. Most (in my experience) are liberally biased, however you had the rare occasion (well it is rare for me, feel free to disagree here) of seeing a more conservative film. I'd like to say that those promoting sex-education use the same tactics, we are just more used to it because most people already agree with what they're saying so they are inclined to gloss over the bias. I wouldn't bother complaining if I were you, bias is bias

  • sam

    That's insane! I didn't watch this, but it does surprise me that that the BBC was so biased in its reporting. That said, I guess if it was a documentary made by a doc film maker, they often are biased to the journalist's own point of view.

    On the whole, the BBC does have a reputation for being a lefty liberal channel so this is odd.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Came straight to this page? Visit DollyMix for loads more stories!