Celebrity blow up dolls: creepy, disgusting, and absolutely awful

Apparently, a company called Pipedream Products (google at your own risk) produces celebrity blow up sex dolls as part of their "Super Star Series". They have dolls of:

Eva Longoria: she's your whore next door!
Lindsay Lohan: no witty slogan, just references to her bad driving and Herbie movie
Jessica Simpson: Crazy Daisy! (pictured)
Jessica Alba: Jessica Sin, explore the dark side of this sexy lil angel!
Sarah Jessica Parker: Sex in her Shitty, She loves Big!, and Sarah Jessica Porkher

You can view all of the images here (if you dare). While some of the dolls do not look identical to the real person, they similarities are uncanny, especially when they borrow from current or past roles to encourage the sense of familiarity and desire.

This is absolutely disgusting. While I am horrified by sex dolls and the way they objectify women's bodies for the sole purpose of sexual fulfillment, I am sick to my stomach at the thought of these dolls being produced. I'm not big on lawsuits, but I could definitely get behind any of these women for suing the shit out of Pipedream Products for producing sex dolls in their likeness.

I can understand that for some people, sex dolls are an innocent fetish and they do not intend to objectify women... but too bad. You do. A sex doll is 100% under the control of its owner and serves as a passive sex object. These women did not consent for their likeness to be used to create a sex toy, and highly doubt many women (except for those who have willingly entered the sex industry) would.

There is a huge difference between female porn stars and these dolls. For one, (most) female porn stars provide their consent every time they make a pornographic film. For another, well, they have a pulse. I don't really know what I can say to illustrate the vast difference between sex workers and sex toys. Some sex workers feel a sense of agency in their work, while others are forced into it and suffer from violence, drug addiction, and STDs. Sex toys, more accurately sex dolls, are not alive, they cannot consent. They are passive recipients, to put it mildly. For the women whose likenesses have been used to create these dolls, I'm sure it's a more horrifying experience and an extreme personal violation. I highly doubt they see the dolls as passive recipients of sex.

Liz Abinante loves sex, booze, and rock and roll so much that she actually studies them in graduate school. This post was originally from her blog at anythings.org.

[Image from Splash News]

Auntie Em

"Some would argue that a man abusing a sex doll for his own pleasure is better than some innocent woman or god forbid a child being raped! So thats one benefit of sex dolls."

What the fuck!? You really think that's how it works?

tp

I think you need to get a life, get off your high horse and enter the real world and whats more get your facts right first before having a rant.

I agree sex dolls are not for everybody, but nobody forces people to buy them, its personal choice for a start. Some would argue that a man abusing a sex doll for his own pleasure is better than some innocent woman or god forbid a child being raped! So thats one benefit of sex dolls.

As to your comments regarding "These women did not consent for their likeness to be used to create a sex toy" total crap. These sex dolls are produced under licence and the porn star who has a doll created like her are paid "royalties" for each doll sold. FACT. The porn star is also paid an upfront fee for the use of her name. The porn star in question is more than happy for a doll of her likeness to be made and sold because she benefits financially from it. FACT. So before you rant about lawsuits do your research and get your facts right first! Incidentally, they make male dolls too, perhaps you might like to try one cos it sounds like you need something like that.