free hit counter code
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up
Elizabeth Abinante

Is the media coverage of the Jena 6 racist?

the Jena tree where the nooses were hungI was not planning on posting anything while Cate is away on vacation, but recent events have motivated me to write an article about the Jena 6. If you have not heard of this case, I recommend you read some of the articles I've listed at the bottom of this post to familiarize yourself with the events. Because you often can't separate racism from sexism, it's important to increase awareness of them to feminists around the globe. The Feminist Wetblanket will return shortly.

If you haven't heard about the Jena 6 by now, it's probably because major media networks haven't been willing to touch it until recently. I'm of the opinion that the story so classically represents how racism is still alive and well in the United States and, that because of this, networks like CNN, ABC, and especially FOX, weren't sure how to approach the issue when it was so obvious. I've seen dozens of stories that hinted at a racial bias that have been aired on major media networks, but I've haven't seen anything akin to the Jena 6 story in quite awhile.

To the viewer, the attempted murder charges of the 6 black students are obviously racist. While those boys do deserve some punishment for their actions, so do the white boys who hung the nooses. It's my understanding that expulsion was the intended punishment, but was later changed to a 3 day suspension. A 3 day suspension does not teach a teenager what they've done wrong. It gives them time to hang out with their friends and relax. And if there is even a hint of social learning here, I doubt their parents cared enough to punish their children. I could be wrong - their parents could be a paragon of democracy who punished their sons as gravely as they deserved to be. Even if it was a prank, the children should be punished severely enough to make it clear that pranks of this magnitude should not be allowed. These boys are still children: only a child would be stupid enough to do something so hateful and either not realize the ramifications or believe that they could get away with it, either because they knew others felt the same way or because they were cocky.

Everything in the coverage of this is implied. We're supposed to just know that the nooses were meant to tell the black boys they didn't belong at this tree. Anyone who isn't familiar with the KKK and their lovely tactics or the history of tension between blacks and whites in the south wouldn't know this was the message. Sure, they would understand the threat, but they wouldn't understand the background and why this is such a shocking incident. They wouldn't understand just why it is that the nooses were so terrible to invoke 6 boys to beat up a fellow classmate. And anyone not reading between the lines wouldn't pick up that the charges are biased because they are based on more than just the fact that 6 black boys beat up 1 white boy. They're based on a traditional view that blacks "can't do that" to whites because they're inferior. Not understanding the history of the south and the racial tension that still exists there makes this case feel like it was all a simple misunderstanding. But it's not just a simple misunderstanding: it's a frighteningly real chain of events set into motion based on antiquated views of race that relied on violence to send messages of who is allowed access to what and who can and can't do certain things. Myth of the black rapist, anyone? I'm sure poor Angela Davis is not very happy with the current state of events.

I'm of the opinion that the Jena 6 should receive the same punishment as their antagonizers: a 3 day suspension. Essentially, a slap on the wrist. To not correctly punish an act that sends a message of hatred as strong as the nooses did to the black students also sends the message that these acts of hatred will go unpunished. The fact of the matter is, the white students "hinted" (I would go as far as saying they actually threatened) that they were going to commit a hate crime if the black students sat under the tree again.

But there is a root to this story that I don't think any of the reporting networks have yet addressed: why did the black students feel they had to ask if it was ok for them to sit under the tree? When you look at the case from this point of view, it shouldn't come ask a shock that the black students are being tried for attempted murder while the white students faced literally no criminal charges. Louisiana may not be the most liberal of states, but they do have a court system that will hopefully recognize this case as a prime example of racism. The sad thing is, it shouldn't even have to come to that: the boys should have never been charged in the first place. How often to 6 white boys get charged with attempted murder after beating up another kid at school? I guarantee you the same thing happens with gangs in southern California and they aren't getting brought up on attempted murder charges.

In the case of black and white, it seems little has changed since 1865. What actually scares me the most about this case is the media coverage. I have yet to hear the word "racist" uttered by any reporter or journalist. It seems as the though the media, in an attempt to remain neutral (as if they ever are), refuses to even say "racist" in their news reports. But by ignoring this message of hate based in racism, are they conveying a message of ignorance and racism themselves?

Since I've written this article early this morning, the charges for two of the boys have been reduced.

News coverage:
CNN | Residents: Nooses spark school violence, divide town
Truth Out | Injustice in Jena as Nooses Hang From the "White Tree"
The Observer | Racism goes on trial again in America's Deep South

Posted by on September 4, 2007

A look at an inspiring family and how breakfast clubs and after school activities have changed their lives

Comments

Props for a fine article, but I do want to mention that people are quick to throw off on the South as a hotbed of racism. I've lived in several parts of the US and found racism to be alive and well everywhere from New England to the West Coast. No area of the country has a monopoly on racism. In fact, for a period of time the largest KKK membership in the nation was in the midwestern state of Indiana.

Posted by: Allison | September 4, 2007 6:51 PM

A group of people beating a person to the ground and kicking him is against the law in America. It's very convenient to use the old "Racism in the South" ploy to pull in some readers and throw in the population figures for added measure. I'm suprized you wrote at all except for maybe some face time online. I'd also add that these "boys" who did the kick 'em in the face while your down style of fighting under the law are chronologically adults. In the ring, when a man is down, the fight is over unless he gets up for more. The attempted murder charges are because of the continued beating of a person who was unable to defend himself at all and maybe even unconcious.

Maybe you should have followed your own advice in line one of this marvelously construed offering.

Uncle Dick

Posted by: Uncle Dick | September 4, 2007 9:04 PM

Maybe the most insightful article I've seen on this "hot" topic. I think it's only hot for the fund raising activists. A couple of noteworthy items in this story that have not made the e-mail circuit. The US Justice Dept., including the FBI hate crimes division, did a complete investigation and found no wrong doing by authorities. They did recommend that a stiffer penalty should have been applied to the noose incident and a statement condemning the incident was in order from the School Board. Also, recently the 1st of the 6 convicted last month, Mycheal Bell, was denied bail because this was his 4th violent offense of his adolescent life. It's been reported that the six had no prior arrest. There has been a lot said that makes this a better story for fundraising, but just simply isn't true. The issues you bring up are real issues in this country, including implications from the media. Unfortunately, fundraising activists need racism to exists for financial reasons, so they do little to help heal the scars of racism.

Posted by: Steve | September 4, 2007 11:03 PM

This writer obviously needs to be "re-educated" by moving to detroit or Harlem and seeing how blacks truly live...great job Abraham Lincoln you've damned America forever

Posted by: Sonny | September 4, 2007 11:26 PM

Hmm,
Sonny, you are really funny. Seriously, you are funny. Or maybe you didn't intend to be? Ha ha.

Posted by: tiks | September 5, 2007 12:05 AM

I don't think any of the boys in this incident 0 black or white - should go unpunished. I don't think they should be charged with attempted murder. They should be punished accordingly.

And yes, I do agree, the south is painted as a hotbed of racism. I've been there, it's not so bad. I've seen racism just as terrible in California, and this is supposed to be a liberal state. The south is the brunt of a lot of generalizing about racism when, to be honest, the midwest and parts of the east coast are just as bad.

It's not so much about the acts anymore, those have been covered from every angle humanly possible. It's about the media coverage and the ways they're manipulating the truth and hiding what begs to be said. If someone would just throw out there that maybe, just maybe, these charges may be racially motivated, it would get the ball rolling on an entirely different - but no less important - discussion.

Interesting facts, Steve. I didn't find those in any of the articles I read. Thanks!

Posted by: Liz | September 5, 2007 1:37 AM

The only question I wish to pose is this: What if the roles were reversed, and it was 6 white boys who attacked a black boy? Would this be handled differently? Of course it would. I will never deny that there is inherent racism in our society, but it most definitely works both ways. Its unfortunate, but true.

Posted by: Mike | September 5, 2007 4:13 AM

This is a feminist blog and this post is inappropriate for the audience.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 5, 2007 10:32 AM

Obviously I don't know all the facts, it's not reported on in the UK and internet articles can be biased, but I also found the whole ''asking for permission to sit under the tree'' thing a bit peculiar. That in itself suggests institutionalized racism at work even before it became violent.

Posted by: Jaime | September 5, 2007 11:09 AM

I saw this post while updating myself on the Jena 6 situation in Louisiana. Unfortunately some of the events are not posted. After the nooses were hung from the tree the boys were reinstated in school by the District Attorney prosecuting the these young men. It was an in school suspension and the white boys didn't miss a day of school. The District Attorney then comes to the school with a police force and tells the student(blacks) he can destroy their lives with the stroke of a pen.

Before this incident these young men are being charged with happened other incidents against them fueled the fires. A group of white young men jumped on one of the ones being charged and beat him, a gun was brought on school property and pointed at Mr. Bell, the young man that was jumped on is friends with the guys that hung the nooses and felt he could use racial slurs at the 6 young men before they jumped on him. These white young men were never prosecuted or punished for any of their crimes.

You can only beat people down so much before they rise up. On that day they had just had enough and fought back. I don't agree with the violence, but if they white boys can jump on them and nothing be done then these black boys should get the same treatment.

I almost forgot, after the white boy pointed a firearm and 3 black boys wrestled it from him, the black boy was charged with theft. Racism is alive and well in America not just the south but all over America.

Posted by: SC Gal | September 5, 2007 2:38 PM

If anyone can not see this as RACISM it is because they are racist also.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 6, 2007 4:43 PM

It's never irrelevant to point out injustices Mikey. If you don't like it, then you don't have to read it.

Posted by: Heleana | September 7, 2007 2:30 PM

Reading some of the posts by whites, I am convinced that many, if not most, whites in America are simply mentally ill. There is an evil blindness brought about by their racism. Just like Henry Clay said, "Of all the descriptions of our population, and of either portion of the African race, the free people of colour are by far, as a class, the most ...depraved and abandoned...They are not slaves, and yet they are not free. The laws it is true, proclaim them free; but prejudices more powerful than any law, deny them the privileges of freemen. They occupy a middle station between the free white population of the United States, and the tendency of their habits is to corrupt both." Such are the feeling of racists and they will not be going to heaven.

Posted by: ddsharper | September 8, 2007 6:25 AM

Why doesn't CNN tell the entire story about Jena? CNN is helping keep racism in American alive and well. Why don't you tell the whole story?

By and by, people still don't know the story. THE SEED OF RACISM WAS ALREADY PLANTED when the black kids asked the principal for PERMISSION to sit under the "white's only tree" on school property. The next day the nooses. The principal expelled the white youth but it was overturned by the superintendant and they were suspended. The next day black kid jumped at party by white group. The next day whtie boy has a shot gun and it was taken out of his hands by a black guy. Black guy is charged for having the weapon. DA comes to the school and in the auditorium where one side is black and the other is white points to the black guys and tell them he can take there lives away with a stroke of a pen. White boy taunts black boys calling them the n- and got his butt kicked. Attempted murder charges are filed against the black guys.
You white people are in denial and now you think the black boys should go to prison for the rest of their lives. Get'em Rev Al.

Posted by: kym | September 20, 2007 1:53 PM

A group of black boys threatened a single white boy. The white boy ran to get a gun for protection. The black boys stole the gun from him while he was digging it out of his vehicle.

I'm so tired of you ignorant fuckers thrwoing around the race card when you are so fucking uniformed.

Posted by: whatever | September 20, 2007 8:30 PM

There is racism involved on both sides. The acts by both sides are deplorable but both are not able to be treated the same in the eyes of the law. If any one person would be against the protests in support of people who committed violent crimes it would be Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. who was advocated non-violence. Violence is not the answer and all that the ensuing protests will do is bolster the thought that ganging up on one person (I do believe there were three white boys who hung the nooses) in the name of "racism" is not only ok but is glorified. The people who use physical attacks against those who did not physically attack them should be tried for their actions. The context of the attack should be taken into consideration but is not a free-ticket to get away with violence.

Posted by: Bryan | September 20, 2007 10:10 PM

If you and two of your friends were unarmed on the way to a convenient and a guy who particpated in a group that beat you seen you there and pulled a gun on you what would you do. Maybe you would turn and run? Thats may work if he doesnt shot you in the back. There was no threats exchanged and I know that for a fact. To make matters worse the cop did arrest those kids for theft of a fire arm. Open up your eyes and quit telling yourself lies. Our local news stations are providing witness accounts by nothing but white people and none that they interviewed even WITNESSED the event. You dont like the word racism then call it what you want. It is what it is.

Posted by: Jena resident | September 21, 2007 5:34 AM

I have read about these events and what you say is dead on. The media, especially Fox News, has no intention of giving this matter fair coverage time. It's such a shame that freedom of press doesnt mean anything but the freedom to lie. The citizens of America has become victims of ignorance.
Love and be loved
Hate and be hated

Posted by: Victims of Ignorance | September 21, 2007 5:38 AM

From what I read about this case it seem that these kids never had a fair case. I believe in the justice system (not just because im white) but because it power relies on our faith in it. Sadly sometime faith betrays you but that doesnt mean you give up on it. This kid Michael should get a fair trial or have the words justice, equality, and liberty become nothing but advertisements for illegal immigrants. its ok u can giggle about that last part if u want.

Posted by: Donny | September 21, 2007 5:53 AM

If six white students had beat up a single black student...that would have been a "Hate Crime!" and the black students would have demanded the white students be tried as racists. So what's the difference? I don't see anything different between this and the Duke "rape" case...except the colors are reversed.

Posted by: thom | September 23, 2007 3:05 PM

This is a "feminist blog?" I take offense with that statement!!! It's sexist!!! Isn't that what feminists are against?

Posted by: Dana | September 24, 2007 1:21 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.