The "Feminism and Pop Culture " conference: Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Cate is almost done ranting and shares with us her final conclusions about the FWSA's "Feminism and Pop Culture" conference...
By the end of Friday's speeches I felt more than a little preached at, and as if I should be apologizing for being born after 1970. I also felt as though I should head straight to Boots for some makeup remover, and perhaps ask around for the the name of a good plastic surgeon to help me get a new, less socially acceptable face.
While the FWSA have truly genuine intentions, their posters declaring that "Whatever your Feminism, you'll find growing networks or dedicated researchers and activists with membership in the Feminst and Women's Studies Association" is a bit bullshit. It would be one thing if it was an association exclusive to scholars or professors, but it's not. "Whatever your feminism..." To be perfectly honest, the whole conference came off a bit elitist.
Perhaps I chose the wrong sessions to go to, or had too high of expectations. But yet, after nearly a weeks reflection, I really don't think that's the case. I went in with an open mind, and was left feeling like I could never be feminist enough for almost all of the women in that room.
Yvonne Tasker, another keynote speaker, explained how the military spends unbelievable amounts of time and effort in designing the female soldiers uniforms to look just the right amount of "feminine" (read: just the right amount of breast), and I couldn't help but wonder how the second wavers seemed to have a problem with female soldiers being made to hide their curves, yet think a young feminist doing anything other than taping down her chest, and, god forbid, showing a bit of cleavage, is exploitive.
I've heard the argument way too many times that young feminists who buy makeup, read women's magazines, and go shopping, are buying into the institutions that want to keep women in subservient roles. As one Dollymix commenter said, "So, how is your perusal of those magazines or your shopping in those fashionable boutiques challenging that?" Generalize much?
Not all of us who "shop", are buying Dior or Kate Moss for Topshop, or are even shopping in "fashionable boutiques". We're not obsessing in front of the mirror and telling ourselves we're ugly, just because we're putting on makeup. (Or trying to look like Barbie, for that matter.) We're not eating salads or drinking water because we're anorexic, or throwing up our meals afterwards. I don't have gym membership because I think I'm not worthy of love, unless I'm a size 4. I do it to stay mentally and physically healthy because HEY! endorphins are good for you. Not all of us who do things that "don't challenge women's roles", are idiots, or don't know what we're doing.
I know why I wear makeup. I know why I've dieted in the past, and I know why I've stopped. Just because many feminists my age enjoy high heels and lipstick, doesn't mean that we're not doing a TON of positive things for feminism along the way. If anything, we're not stupid, and just because we're doing something that other feminist , or men, disagree with, doesn't make us wrong, and it doesn't mean that you "know better" than us.
People and "real" feminist generalizing and saying that feminist who wear makeup, shop, and read magazines aren't challenging the institutions that want to keep women subservient, are dead fucking wrong. Wrong because it suggests that we're just blindly going through our lives and aren't making informed decisions; wrong as it just further perpetuates female stereotypes, and stereotypes about feminists.
But I guess if we're not being subservient to the likes of Cosmopolitan and Girls Gone Wild, our only other option would be to pigeon hole ourselves and be subservient to the traditional feminist values of our foremothers and academic feminists.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Cate Sevilla is the Editor of Dollymix and regular contributor to Shiny blogs.













THANK YOU!!!
Really good articles, very informative.
Posted by: Helen Eff | July 4, 2007 3:36 PM