"Shorts do not suit curves": Scarlett Johansson's ass "looks fat" in "bad shorts"
Scarlett Johansson is lovely. She is. But, no matter what you say Grazia, Glamour, and Cosmopolitan, she's not "curvy". She just simply has big(ger)breasts than most actresses and has an ass that isn't malnourished. Just because she's bigger than Lindsay Lohan, and numerous other emaciated and/or drugged-out "glamorous" actresses, doesn't mean that she's "curvy". However, The Daily Mail wants to further point out Scarlett's curves by publishing photos of her wearing shorts under the headline: "'World's sexiest body' Scarlett sports a plump derrière - or is it just bad shorts?" Apparently Scarlett didn't the The Daily Mail's memo, that "As every real woman knows, shorts do not suit curves." They don't? I didn't know that. I guess I'm not real!
[via The Daily Mail]
[image via Getty]
Du hast voll recht, bin voll deiner Meinung ;) Nur weil Scarlett nicht magersuchtig oder etc. ist, heißt das noch lange nicht, dass sie kurvig ist. --> That was german and now in English :P :
You are really right, I agree your opinion! Only because Scarlett isn't anorexic or emaciated it doesn't mean, that she's curvy ... LIKE YOUR PAGE! :)
Posted by: <3 piper, prue and phoebe<3 | July 30, 2007 7:06 PM